{"id":2003,"date":"2024-12-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-05T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eaganimmigration.com\/the-future-of-vawa-and-t-visas-under-trump\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T12:13:37","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T17:13:37","slug":"the-future-of-vawa-and-t-visas-under-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eaganimmigration.com\/en\/the-future-of-vawa-and-t-visas-under-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future of VAWA and T Visas Under Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"\"\"\n\nBy Alicia M. Atteberry<\/strong>\n\nFor many in the immigrant community, and for those of us working in immigration law, anxiety is high after the re-election of Donald Trump. The rhetoric coming from him and his campaign toward the immigrant community has been harsh, to say the least. He has promised to make immigration one of his top priorities, and stated he plans to issue executive orders on day one of his second term that would fundamentally change the United States immigration system. These changes could impact U.S. immigration policy across the board, affecting people of all nationalities as well as availability of and processes for many different types of visas and immigration benefits.\n\nAt Eagan Immigration, we specialize in saying \u201cYes, we can!\u201d where other immigration attorneys have told our clients, \u201cNo, you can\u2019t.\u201d Nothing about that has changed. Whatever happens, Eagan Immigration will be working on solutions and strategies to continuing saying \u201cYes!\u201d to our current and future clients. We are committed to advocating for our clients whatever may come. Many of our clientele are applying for immigration benefits based on two specific laws: The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Here\u2019s what we know about how the incoming administration might impact those types of applications.\n\nWhat are VAWA and TVPA?<\/strong>\n\nThe Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)<\/strong> first introduced for consideration in 1990 by then-Senator President Joe Biden. VAWA was intended to provide resources for abused women, introduce new guidance on how domestic abuse would be handled by law enforcement, and provoke a national conversation that would change prevailing attitudes about sexual violence and domestic abuse. The legislation was ultimately passed in 1994, making it a law. VAWA included provisions for noncitizens, who are particularly vulnerable in domestic abuse situations because they may fear contact with police even more than they fear their lawful permanent resident or citizen abuser. VAWA immigration cases are based on these provisions, and they allow the noncitizen victim to pursue immigration benefits without the help of the citizen or LPR who abused them.\n\nThe Trafficking Victims Protection Act<\/strong> was passed in 2000 and included the re-authorization of VAWA. Its intention was to create government programs and resources to address the growing issue of human trafficking, especially into the sex trade, slavery, or involuntary servitude, which the Act describes as \u201cincreasingly perpetrated by organized, sophisticated criminal enterprises.\u201d The very nature of this legislation required it to include protections for noncitizens, who make up most trafficking victims in the United States. TVPA again provided immigration benefits to victims to enable them to seek help and speak out to law enforcement about their trafficking without fear of detention or deportation. Eagan specializes in this type of immigration petition, which is commonly referred to as a \u201cT Visa.\u201d\n\nthe laws associated with VAWA and TVPA do not expire or have an end date. However, Congress must periodically appropriate funds for and reauthorize the government operation of grant programs associated with them. This is why there are \u201creauthorizations,\u201d for the funding that supports VAWA and TVPA. Sometimes these reauthorizations also revise and\/or expand the scope of the laws, such as when U Visas were created. VAWA funding was reauthorized in 2000, 2005, 2013, 2019, and again in 2022. In September 2024, an additional $690 million in funding for VAWA programs was announced by the Justice Department. TVPA, meanwhile, was reauthorized and expanded in 2003, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, and 2022.\n\nWhat Happened to VAWA and TVPA Applications Under the First Trump Administration?<\/strong>\n\nVAWA funding expired and was extended temporarily several times in 2018 and 2019, during Trump\u2019s first term in office. Reauthorization was delayed first by a government shutdown, then by Republicans under Trump objecting to a new restriction in the revised Act that made possession of a gun illegal for those convicted of domestic violence, assault, or stalking. This break in funding affected some related government programs. The reauthorization was officially passed, including the firearms restrictions, in April 2019.\n\nHowever, these funding issues themselves had little to no effect on VAWA and T Visa applications at the time. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the department that processes these applications, does not use funding from VAWA or TVPA for general operations such as processing applications. They are funded largely by the fees they charge, as well as receiving a Congress-approved budget for humanitarian visas that have low or no fees.\n\nDespite this, ehad funding issues that resulted in huge backlogs, prompting requests for additional funding. Usually, USCIS increases their fees every 4 years, once per presidential term. Under the Trump administration, a fee change proposal was submitted but rejected by a federal judge. This means the main source of funding for USCIS did not increase until its most recent fee changes in 2024, during a period of high inflation and increasing demand on USCIS. This worsened the backlog at USCIS and caused longer delays. That is key to understanding the various ways a second Trump administration could affect VAWA and T Visa applications, as well as USCIS processing as a whole.\n\nVAWA and T Visa applications were more affected by policy changes. Under the first Trump administration, what counts as \u201cextreme cruelty\u201d and abuse for VAWA applicants was restricted, and the administration even made changes to the legal definition of domestic violence to exclude emotional abuse. Similar exclusionary standards were put in place for T Visas, rejecting applicants who had committed crimes while under the control of their trafficker or who had remained in the U.S. too long after escaping. This led to an increase in rejected applications.\n\nHow Could VAWA and T Visas be Affected Under the New Administration?<\/strong>\n\nThe first thing that should be said is: we don\u2019t know for sure. The Trump campaign made a lot of big promises and said a lot about immigration. Even with a majority in both houses of Congress, it\u2019s still not clear that they have the power to follow through on those proposals, but it\u2019s also not certain that they won\u2019t find a way. Trump\u2019s allies, backers, and supporters have had much more time to strategize and prepare for the coming administration, but the same is true of those who oppose Trump\u2019s plans<\/u><\/em>. Trump Republicans have also defied norms and pushed legal boundaries many times, but again, the opposition now knows to expect that and has had four years to bolster their defenses. Still, we can only predict based on what we know.\n\nVAWA and TVPA benefits, which include U Visas, are both based on laws that have gone through a long vetting process to be approved multiple times by both parties over the last quarter of a century. Laws can be repealed, and funding can be stopped, but it is unlikely that such long-standing laws will be directly overturned.\n\nHowever, all the things that changed under the first Trump administration could potentially happen again. Here are two key things to expect:\n